Money management and finances for ITER are so complicated that it needs its own currency. This is known as the ITER Unit of Account. Despite its cost and complexity, ITER will be a solution to the energy crisis.
In our opinion the investment of billions of dollars for ITER will be worth the cost. ITER will solve the worlds energy problems for the next 30 million years, a major return for the investment. In the near future the availability of fossil fuels will decline and if we do not find alternative energy sources the world will go into an energy crisis. Nuclear fusion is an option in alternative energy resources. The ITER proposes little danger to the world and will run on no more than seaweed and lithium.
Overall, the ITER is an investment that will pay off for 30 million years, and "will benefit everyone by providing, clean,near limitless energy" (West, 2014).
Good work on this so far R and E. It's clear you support further work with regards to nuclear fusion, but you need some relevant, clear facts to support your opinion. Saying something like ITER will "give back to every person" is a bit broad. Try something like "ITER will benefit everyone by providing clean, near limitless energy." Then explain why. Does that make sense?
ReplyDelete